Skip navigation

Blogs

7 Posts tagged with the education tag
0

Harvey Koeppel and the Center for CIO Leadership were the hosts for the Virtual Roundtable, which focused on the ongoing education of CIOs, by providing real life examples from industry leaders from all facets of the industry.  Today’s session - Next Generation IT Governance continued to prove that Harvey has the right pulse on the industry and ongoing CIO needs. There were several key take-aways that surfaced from the conversation.

 

Leaders from Cranfield and Yale Universities led the group in a discussion regarding the need for IT Governance and in how to structure decision-making and create accountability when forging down the IT Governance path.  Having transparency and a framework for effective communications, aids in changing the organization’s behaviors that are necessary to implement successful IT Governance programs.  Another facet of the model is the need for companies to co-exist in a collaborative environment and to have a set of metrics and scorecards to promote the current state of the organization.

 

The speakers and participants shared their perspectives on this very important topic. How are you looking to evolve IT Governance and enable your businesses to succeed and thrive in this-hyper competitive environment?

 

Sue Bergamo

CIO

BTE Consulting

0

The Center recently hosted a virtual roundtable on an important topic to CIOs, Partnering to Drive Change through Analytics, where we explored how organizations are applying analytics best practices today, the business value that the best performing organizations are experiencing.

 

In preparing for the session, I developed some observations on the topic that I think provide a useful perspective for CIOs as you all consider taking action on getting value from leveraging analytics and creating business value in your own enterprise.

 

Not a new topic

In researching the literature prior to the session to provide some historical perspective on how far back this topic goes, I discovered that people have been talking about what we describe as this massive explosion of data, initially called information overload, for longer than many of us have been in this industry. From what I could ascertain, the earliest known attribution of the term “information overload” was credited to an IBM advertising supplement in the New York Times on April 30, 1961. So obviously this is not a new topic.

 

So what’s different now: more data than ever before

That being said, we are clearly at a new frontier of information overload and explosion of data, which is astronomically more challenging, but at the same time very exciting from the point of view of being able to impact the way we do business.

 

To put this into a context for today, I like to look at the retail industry, which is at the forefront of collecting massive amounts of data, and more importantly putting that data to use in changing the way they go to market, manage the customer experience, streamline the supply chain, and create the next generation customer. Walmart is often cited as a great example as a retailer leveraging data and analytics across all of these elements. A fact that I found particularly noteworthy - as of about nine months ago, Walmart was processing over a million customer transactions per hour, feeding databases that were estimated in excess of two and a half petabytes (roughly the equivalent of 167 times all of the books in the Library of Congress.)

 

Walmart has unprecedented insight into what their customers are doing, what they want, and how to respond across their 8,500 stores worldwide. At the same time, they need to find a way to translate that insight into actions that drive customer benefit and stakeholder value.

 

How should CIOs respond to this incredible opportunity?

“Revolutions in science have often been preceded by revolutions in measurement,” said Sinan Aral, a business professor at New York University, in a 2010 article in the Economist. He went on to say that just as the microscope transformed biology by exposing germs, and the electron microscope changed physics, the proliferation of data is turning the social sciences upside down.

 

I see that as representative of the conversation we as CIOs should be having now – how to apply this insight, these data, to become the microscope for how businesses can learn and advance ourselves and our industries. There are a few takeaways for me from Katharyn White’s presentation that I would encourage CIOs to consider in looking to manage these conversations.

 

  • It’s a journey – the research presented reflects the evolutionary process of adopting, implementing, and embedding the value of analytics in the enterprise. And as Katharyn emphasized, the process of gaining buy-in and creating change is actually a core part of the implementation. In leading change management efforts myself over the years, I see that implementing analytics is the type of program that requires deep change across the enterprise, and core shifts in the way people make decisions, operate and go to market. CIOs can leverage their expertise in change management, as well as their enterprise-wide view of data and information, to make the journey more successful.

 

  • Learn from others – the research also showed that companies can be successful getting to value across many industries; success in analytics is not industry dependent, or even geography dependent. There are companies of all types applying best practices and getting exciting results – whether it is in growing sales, increasing efficiencies, or improving individual customer interactions. Katharyn shared the view that success with analytics benefits greatly from a cross-industry perspective, and from seeking out examples from many other environments as a way to leapfrog in your own industry. This echoes my own experience – and that of the Center’s commitment to peer-sharing. CIOs should seek to systematically leverage learning from others to innovate in an emerging area like analytics.

 

  • Leverage your C-suite relationships – by definition, getting value from analytics, especially as companies migrate from aspirational to experienced or experienced to transformed (as described in the research), clearly requires data or information to be collected across functional silos and/or across multiple business units. Whether or not the data collection and management moves to the point of being centralized within the enterprise, there needs to be an integrated and shared view of who is doing what, and how they data can be cleaned, verified and leveraged across the silos. This is an important opportunity for CIOs to leverage your hard-won C-suite relationships, and reach out to connect on an integrated view of the possibilities to move to value in your enterprise. One partnership in particular that Katharyn mentioned – the one with the Chief Marketing Officer – struck me as interesting for CIOs to consider. Analytics is at the forefront of where marketing and technology are coming together, and the partnership represents an emerging opportunity for CIOs to truly push the needle on analytics and how the company goes to market.

 

What are you doing in your organization to move the needle on the path value through analytics? What lessons can you share with others?

0

Phil’s bio on Twitter says he’s an Author, Independent Technology Consultant, Speaker, and Unabashed Rush Fan.  While I like his politics, I rely enjoy his blogs.  Phil writes on a broad array of business and IT subjects with a good sense of humor, which makes reading his blogs a bit easier.  He also incorporates multi-media webcast and comic strips in his blog postings which again make him easy to follow.

 

 

As I noted above, Phil writes on a broad array of subjects and his web site is very well organized.  Some of the topics he covers are: Enterprise Systems, IT Project Failures, Management, Social Media, Software, Technology and trends.

 

 

Phil is publishing a new book The New Small in November and it promises to be quite interesting.  Here is a link to a number of links on the topic (http://www.thenewsmall.com/).

 

 

Here is Phil's information to add to your list of “Who’s Worth Following”:

 

 

Let me know if you think this is a valuable service and helps you define a set of useful people to follow on the social media of your choice. Also, if you think of someone I should add to the list let me know.

 

 

 

William A. Crowell

wcrowell@asuret.com

Twitter: billcio

Facebook: William A Crowell

LinkedIn: Bill Crowell

0

I recently read a Forbes article Solving National IT Issues: We must address national strategic issues from a technology--not political--standpoint, written by CIO blogger, Mike Schaffner.  While I respect Mike’s point that issues cannot be addressed from a political standpoint, I think he is missing the mark slightly, and doing a disservice to all CIOs.  The more I read and reflected on the article, the more it seemed to me that this is a movie that we have seen many times before.

 

Forget, for a moment, that we are talking about the CIO of the United States of America.  Imagine the more familiar context of a huge enterprise that is 200+ years old, complete with policies, procedures and methodologies – ways and means of doing business that give new meaning to the term "legacy systems", not to mention business silos.  Could there possibly exist a more complex (polite term for dysfunctional) environment in which to effectively transact business?

 

Now bring a newly appointed CIO into a newly created position – enterprise CIO, and by the way, define the newly created position in a way where it has an incredible sphere of influence (reporting to the CEO of one of the world's largest enterprises) yet has limited to no real authority, i.e. the line of business (silo) CIOs do not actually report to the new enterprise CIO.  When all of that dust settles, we have a glorious position with lots of responsibility (or at least expectation) and limited to no authority.

 

Now surround all of this with the worst economic condition that any of us (c-suite included) have seen in our lifetime.

 

Given that scenario, do you know anyone that would focus on why digital rights management is an important priority?  Not to make excuses – in spirit, Mike Schaffner has focused on a good set of important technology issues.  His list of strategic priorities is an excellent one.  His observation that Vivek Kundra has largely focused on "keeping the lights on and reducing expenses" (my words, not his) is, from what I have seen, correct.  At the last government CIO roundtable that I attended with the IEG and Public CIO Magazine, Vivek Kundra in fact presented his IT agenda and was most proud of the fact that he eliminated $80 billion in government IT projects that appeared to be either misdirected, not needed or so far off the tracks that they could not be saved.  He was able to then both cut expenses and re-direct a portion of the savings to other more productive efforts.

 

Sound like a familiar theme?  This is an example (on steroids) of why we created the Center for CIO Leadership – to help CIOs rise above the role of IT cost center manager and to transform themselves into better business (or government) people.  While I don't think that we ever envisioned transforming an enterprise quite as large and complex as the government of the United States, I believe that our understanding of the challenges, the opportunities and, to a growing extent, some of the solutions that we are developing are completely applicable.

 

If you were CIO of the US, what would you do?  Would you focus more on strategy, technology or politics?  Feel free to respond and share your opinions and suggestions…

0

I'm clearing up my “following” list on Twitter as part of my effort to develop a list of people that I see as thought leaders in specific areas who are worth following. I'm currently following just 56 people and through this process I'm hopeful I can whittle it down to a dozen or so in specific areas of interest. Paul Greenberg is my first choice in the area of CRM and SCRM.

 

Paul wrote CRM at the Speed of Light back in 2001 and it became known as the “Bible of the Industry”. This itself should make Paul worth following, but I would add that he is a very good writer and provides excellent commentary that is easy to read. For example in a recent blog entitled “The Naked Tweeter: Traditional v. Contemporary Channels of Influence or is it AND Contemporary….?” (http://the56group.typepad.com/pgreenblog/2010/08/the-naked-tweeter-traditional-v-contemporary-channels-of-influence-or-is-it-and-contemporary.html), Paul presents background on how he became a thought leader on CRM and the important role of both traditional and new social media.

 

In another blog on his web site, “Coolness AND Content - SCRM Goes Global in the Same Room” (http://the56group.typepad.com/pgreenblog/2010/07/coolness-and-content---scrm-goes-global-in-the-same-room.html) he has a podcast in which he presents how SCRM should fit into an organization's strategy. His theme is first to define what your trying to accomplish by creating an online community and then develop a plan that accomplishes those goals. It's one of the first descriptions about how SCRM fits that I've understood and got me thinking more about the subject.

 

In another blog he presents a list of people in various fields that he thinks are worth following in the area of CRM and SCRM “Following On More Than Friday: The Experts Worth Checking Out” (http://the56group.typepad.com/pgreenblog/2010/06/following-on-more-than-friday-the-experts-worth-checking-out.html).

Paul is definitely someone worth following. Here is what you need to know to follow Paul:

 

Let me know if you think this is a valuable service and helps you define a set of useful people to follow on the social media of your choice. Also, if you think of someone I should add to the list let me know.

 

William A. Crowell

wcrowell@asuret.com

Twitter: billcio

Facebook: William A Crowell

LinkedIn: Bill Crowell

0

Who's Worth Following?

Posted by William Crowell Sep 10, 2010

I've spent the last year or so blogging on various topics associated with the leadership role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO). I've also developed a list of people I'm following on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. Since I'm now retired I've had the time to do this but in the process I've come to understand how difficult it is for CIO's to become engaged in these new social media communications platforms. Time and information overload seem to be the prime culprits.

 

So I've decided to provide a service to my fellow CIO's by developing a list of people worth following on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. My first recommendation is Chris Curran who is the CTO of Diamond Management and Technology Consulting and his web site www.ciodashboard.com. Chris and his Diamond associates cover a broad range of topics of interest to CIO's that are focused on the management of Information Technology (IT) to provide optimum value to the organization. What I like best about Chris' site is it's tag line “cutting through the noise”. This is exactly what CIO's want.

 

Here is what you need to know to follow Chris:

 

  • Twitter - @cbcurran, #ciodashboard

  • Facebook - Chris Curran

  • LinkedIn - Chris Curran

  • Web Site – www.ciodashboard.com

 

Let me know if you think this is a valuable service and helps you define a set of useful people to follow on the social media of your choice. Also, if you think of someone I should add to the list let me know.

 

William A. Crowell

wcrowell@asuret.com

Twitter: billcio

Facebook: William A Crowell

LinkedIn: Bill Crowell

0

It's the Users Turn

Posted by Paul Ingevaldson Jul 23, 2010

I’ve been in the IT business in various roles for almost 45 years.  During that time, I can never remember a time when we weren’t criticized for being too techie and not understanding the business in which we labor.  I guess I’m just a bit fed up with this constant criticism of our business acumen.  Over my career, I have seen dramatic strides taken by IT practitioners to better understand and identify with the business of our company.  What I haven’t seen over those same years is much of an attempt by our users to understand how IT operates and their responsibilities in assuring corporate success when developing IT systems.

 

I believe the proof of this condition is the ongoing attempts by many companies to minimize their involvement with the IT process by outsourcing, off-shoring and ERPing.  All of these techniques have a common denominator, namely, to reduce the influence of internal corporate IT.  History has shown that these techniques, when improperly implemented, can have severe deleterious effects on the corporation.

 

I’m not against any of these methods categorically.  Each can play a helpful role in an overall IT strategy to minimize cost and maximize output.  What I am against is the use of the techniques as a knee jerk reaction to some perceived problem with corporate IT.  I would argue that IT problems are oftentimes not a problem with internal IT but are problems with the way that the users work with IT to attain their goals.  As far as I know, there is very little training in corporations on how to get the most out of your IT organization.  When systems are in trouble, due to cost overruns or blown schedules, it is always IT’s fault and IT must be held accountable.

 

I would recommend that companies take the time to train their users in how to work effectively with IT.  This starts with strategic planning where IT must be involved so that emerging technologies can be brought to the table.  The company must use an IT steering committee staffed by the corporate officers in order to assure that the right projects are being funded and that IT is aligned with the corporate mission.  The training continues with a thorough understanding of the users role in systems analysis, design, systems testing and post audit.  There needs to be a requirement that the user will spend the time or they will not get the system.

 

The user involvement continues in matters of business continuity.  The users must be involved in planning for physical disasters and security breaches.  This process is very important and is one of corporate survival. They must be able to document what is needed and when it is needed during times of business disruption.  Finally IT and the users must collaborate closely during the initial discussions of mergers or acquisitions in order to assure that the systems are compatible and that they can be adapted for the new organization in a timely manner.  Studies show that IT is most often brought in too late and they become the critical path.

 

This lack of knowledge of IT by users is just as damaging to successful IT systems as IT’s lack of knowledge of the business.  IT has made great strides in this regard.  Now it’s the users turn.